Loot Ting Yee -vs- Natang by Terengganu UMNO

Karpal Singh quoted a legal case in Pengarah Pelajaran Wilayah Persekutuan & Others -v- Loot Ting Yee where the Federal Court had decided that a civil servant did not have a right to be heard as transfer does not amount to dismissal or reduction in rank. He had said the principles in the decision apply equally to state civil servants.

VERSUS

'Natang' a word by Terengganu UMNO after the Sultan of Terengganu appoints another to replace Idris Jusoh (the former MB of Terengganu).

Now which is more TERUK. Karpal or Terengganu UMNO? Karpal was quoting a legal principle to substantiate his claim where as Terengganu UMNO was acting on their emotions due to the fact that the Royalty of Terengganu appoint another and not the choice of PM as MB.

If Karpal is prosecuted, then something is so wrong with our legal system.